This paper presents a comparative analysis of pension systems in Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Panama, examining their efficiency and adequacy. These countries, despite sharing geographic and socio-economic similarities, exhibit distinct approaches to retirement systems. The study analyzes the structure, financing mechanisms, benefit calculation methods, and demographic challenges each system faces. Key indicators such as retirement age, replacement rate, and administrative efficiency are compared to assess the level of social security provided to retirees. Methodologically, this research is based on a comparative study of macroeconomic and demographic factors, using data from governmental reports, international organizations, and academic studies. The analysis focuses on evaluating pension systems in terms of long-term sustainability and benefit adequacy in light of demographic aging and financial pressures. The study finds significant differences in retirement ages, benefit structures, and the role of employer contributions. Costa Rica and Panama have more complex systems with higher retirement ages and structured pension schemes, while Nicaragua operates a simpler system with lower contribution levels and earlier retirement. These findings highlight that although Nicaragua’s system is administratively simpler, it offers lower levels of social security for retirees compared to Costa Rica and Panama. The study concludes with recommendations for potential reforms aimed at enhancing the efficiency and adequacy of these systems, especially in Nicaragua, which faces significant challenges due to demographic trends and economic constraints.